ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction of delirium in trauma patients using interpretable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Subject Registration-Based Augmentation: Alleviating Anatomical Misalignment in Trauma CT for Robust Hemorrhage Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify key risk factors for delirium in trauma patients and to develop an interpretable machine learning model using routinely available demographic, clinical, and laboratory data collected at initial trauma center presentation. We analyzed data from 7,806 trauma patients admitted between 2015 and 2023 and constructed an XGBoost-based prediction model evaluated using a hold-out test set. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations to quantify feature contributions, threshold effects, and interactions. Delirium occurred in 568 patients (7.3%). The model demonstrated robust predictive performance, with an accuracy of 92.0%, a macro-average AUC of 0.76, and a micro-average AUC of 0.96. SHAP analysis identified age, Injury Severity Score, lactate dehydrogenase, and estimated glomerular filtration rate as the most influential predictors of delirium risk. These variables exhibited clinically meaningful threshold effects, including increased risk above approximately 60 years of age, ISS greater than 15, LDH levels exceeding 350 IU/L, and eGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m², as well as notable interactions. Overall, the proposed interpretable machine learning model effectively predicted delirium risk in trauma patients using routine admission data and provides a transparent basis for individualized risk assessment and early prevention strategies in acute trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.