ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2026
Development of ultrasonography for the detection of prostate cancer.
Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an essential tool for localizing intraprostatic tumors and detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). However, limitations related to cost, availability, and the presence of MRI-invisible lesions have driven interest in alternative imaging modalities. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), routinely performed by urologists, has evolved substantially with the development of advanced ultrasound technologies. Conventional gray-scale TRUS enables real-time assessment of prostate morphology and provides guidance for biopsy; however, its sensitivity for detecting csPC remains limited. Recent advances, including 29-MHz micro-ultrasound, color and power Doppler imaging, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, superb microvascular imaging (SMI), and elastography, have significantly expanded the diagnostic capability of ultrasound. Micro-ultrasound offers high-resolution visualization of ductal architecture and lesion morphology, and it has demonstrated diagnostic performance comparable to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in several prospective studies. Doppler-based techniques and SMI enable assessment of tumor-associated vascularity, while elastography provides quantitative assessment of tissue stiffness, which correlates with tumor aggressiveness. The integration of multiple ultrasound modalities, known as multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS), has shown promising diagnostic accuracy for csPC detection. Recent studies suggest that mpUS can identify clinically significant cancers missed by mpMRI and may serve as a complementary or alternative imaging strategy, particularly when MRI is unavailable or impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42243380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.