ArticleScientific reports2026
Data-driven and machine learning framework for Alfalfa yield response to long-term climate variability in the Kansas High Plains (USA).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate extremes and declining water availability in the U.S. High Plains threaten the long-term sustainability of alfalfa production. This study presents a machine learning (ML) based modeling framework to identify and evaluate key agro-climatic predictors of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) yield across nine agricultural districts in Kansas from 1981 to 2018. A novel contribution of this study is the integration of a high-dimensional climate predictor space, long-term historical records, and district-level stratification of irrigated and rainfed systems to systematically assess spatially varying climate-yield relationships. Using a high-dimensional feature space of 117 climate-derived variables from PRISM and yield data from USDA-NASS, a Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm was applied to rank predictors, followed by forward feature selection with three non-parametric regression models. Four spatial configurations were evaluated-statewide, district-specific, irrigated, and rainfed datasets. The Kansas High Plains region, with its strong west-to-east precipitation gradient, groundwater-dependent irrigation systems, and recurrent drought exposure, offers a globally relevant testbed for understanding crop-climate interactions in semi-arid environments. Model evaluation RMSE during feature selection ranged from 0.52 to 1.14 tons/acre. Dew point temperature in August and seasonal VPD metrics emerged as dominant predictors, indicating these variables are strongly associated with late-summer yield variability. Rainfed districts prioritized drought indicators (e.g., no precipitation days, VPD), while irrigated districts showed stronger associations with thermal and humidity metrics. By explicitly accounting for climate sensitivities across management regimes and spatial scales, this framework provides a transferable approach for identifying robust, region-specific climate drivers in high-dimensional agricultural datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.