Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243350›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Understanding farmers' participation in agricultural marketing networks through an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study integrating qualitative barrier identification and structural equation modeling.

Xingyu Liu, Nazanin Kianmehr, Zeinab Asadi, Hajar Zarei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xingyu LiuChengdu Vocational & Technical College of Industry, Chengdu, China.
Nazanin KianmehrDepartment of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Zeinab AsadiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Hajar ZareiDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. royazareie311@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural marketing networks such as cooperatives are widely promoted as mechanisms to improve farmers' market access and income; however, adoption rates remain low in many developing contexts, including Iran. Despite extensive literature based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), existing studies often fail to fully capture context-specific institutional and social barriers, and rarely integrate qualitative insights into quantitative model development. This study addresses these gaps by employing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design to develop and test an integrated behavioral model of farmers' participation in agricultural marketing networks in Fars Province, Iran. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews with 32 farmers were conducted to identify context-specific barriers and underlying mechanisms shaping participation decisions. Thematic analysis revealed four main categories of barriers: economic, institutional, social-informational, and psychological. These findings were systematically transformed into measurement constructs and used to develop a structured questionnaire for the quantitative phase. In the second phase, data from 332 randomly selected farmers were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that attitude (β = 0.30, p < 0.001), perceived behavioral control (β = 0.18, p < 0.05), and social networks (β = 0.37, p < 0.001) significantly influence farmers' intention to participate, while subjective norms (β = 0.07, p > 0.05) and knowledge (β = 0.01, p > 0.05) do not. Trust significantly shapes farmers' attitudes (β = 0.60, p < 0.001) and also has a weaker direct effect on intention (β = 0.09, p < 0.05). Importantly, the composite perceived barriers construct exerts a significant negative effect on intention (β = - 0.06, p < 0.05), reflecting the structural constraints identified in the qualitative phase. The study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how qualitative insights can be systematically translated into measurable constructs within a TPB-based framework, thereby improving contextual validity and explanatory power. It further distinguishes between different forms of social influence, showing that behavioral effects are driven more by observed peer participation through social networks rather than perceived normative pressure. These findings provide important implications for designing trust-based, socially embedded agricultural policies that extend beyond information-driven interventions.

Indexed as

Agricultural marketing networksExploratory sequential mixed-methods designFarmers’ participationInstitutional trustPerceived behavioral controlSocial networksStructural equation modelingTheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID42243350
PMCPMC13493968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.