Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Data driven water quality assessment using machine learning and synthetic data generation.

Naga Durga Satya Siva Kiran Relangi, D Venkata Naga Raju, P Venkata Rama Raju, M Vishnu Vardhana Rao, Krishna Kant Pandey, Vinod Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naga Durga Satya Siva Kiran RelangiDepartment of Information Technology, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women (Autonomous), Bhimavaram, India.
D Venkata Naga RajuDepartment of Information Technology, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women (Autonomous), Bhimavaram, India.
P Venkata Rama RajuDepartment of Information Technology, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women (Autonomous), Bhimavaram, India.
M Vishnu Vardhana RaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (DS), Vignan's Institute of Management & Technology for Women, Hyderabad, India.
Krishna Kant PandeyManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India. krishna.pandey@jaipur.manipal.edu.
Vinod YadavManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India. vinod.yadav@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing fresh and clean water to all is the objective of Sustainable Development Goal 6. Consuming clean water improves health for all living beings worldwide. Therefore, accurately estimating the water quality and classifying the type of water (i.e. whether it is used for potable purposes or not) based on physicochemical parameters is considered a challenging issue due to the dynamic nature of water quality data, the selection of physical or data-driven models used to estimate the water quality and the lack of a large water dataset for training the data-driven models. The primary objective of this research is to generate synthetic dataset(s) and propose state-of-the-art machine learning models for predicting water quality. In this study, synthetic data generation via oversampling is used to balance the water quality dataset and train models on a balanced dataset for water quality classification and prediction. The experimental results indicate that the quality of the synthetic Drinking Water Final dataset produced using SMOTE is satisfactory, as evidenced by a Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) score of 0.0067. Furthermore, the test accuracy of the GB and XGB machine learning models is notably high at 99.47% on the synthetic Drinking Water Final dataset. The performance of the ML model on the synthetic Drinking Water Final dataset generated by a GAN is outstanding; however, the MMD score indicates that the quality of the synthetic data is subpar. Likewise, the MMD score quality of the synthetic Water Quality Analysis dataset produced using SMOTE (MMD = 0.0006) and GAN (MMD = 0.0016) is noteworthy. The comprehensive evaluation findings demonstrate that the synthetic dataset produced through oversampling techniques will enhance the models' predictive accuracy.

Indexed as

Extreme gradient boosting (XGB)Gradient boosting (GB)Logistic regression (LR)Random forest (RF)Synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE)Water quality index (WQI)

Identifiers

PMID42243309
PMCPMC13478298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.