ArticleScientific reports2026
Data driven water quality assessment using machine learning and synthetic data generation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing fresh and clean water to all is the objective of Sustainable Development Goal 6. Consuming clean water improves health for all living beings worldwide. Therefore, accurately estimating the water quality and classifying the type of water (i.e. whether it is used for potable purposes or not) based on physicochemical parameters is considered a challenging issue due to the dynamic nature of water quality data, the selection of physical or data-driven models used to estimate the water quality and the lack of a large water dataset for training the data-driven models. The primary objective of this research is to generate synthetic dataset(s) and propose state-of-the-art machine learning models for predicting water quality. In this study, synthetic data generation via oversampling is used to balance the water quality dataset and train models on a balanced dataset for water quality classification and prediction. The experimental results indicate that the quality of the synthetic Drinking Water Final dataset produced using SMOTE is satisfactory, as evidenced by a Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) score of 0.0067. Furthermore, the test accuracy of the GB and XGB machine learning models is notably high at 99.47% on the synthetic Drinking Water Final dataset. The performance of the ML model on the synthetic Drinking Water Final dataset generated by a GAN is outstanding; however, the MMD score indicates that the quality of the synthetic data is subpar. Likewise, the MMD score quality of the synthetic Water Quality Analysis dataset produced using SMOTE (MMD = 0.0006) and GAN (MMD = 0.0016) is noteworthy. The comprehensive evaluation findings demonstrate that the synthetic dataset produced through oversampling techniques will enhance the models' predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.