Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243272›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Attention U-Net with differential privacy in federated learning framework for brain stroke lesion segmentation.

M Adhi Siva, Chiranji Lal Chowdhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Adhi SivaSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Chiranji Lal ChowdharySchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India. chiranji.lal@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data privacy considerations and data fragmentation between healthcare institutions is causing segmentation of ischemic stroke lesions from neuroimaging to be hindered. The centralized approach may conflict with HIPAA and GDPR, and the federated learning approach does not have proper privacy guarantees nor is it able to capture lesion detail. This work prposes Fed-AttUNet-DP,a three major contributions: a spatial attention mechanism to integrate federated learning for better stroke lesion detection; differential privacy at the client level and secure MPCC at the server level for dual-layered privacy preservation; adaptive federated optimization for non-IID medical data and faster training speed and better performance. The proposed framework is an augmentation to the federated averaging algorithm which exploits attention U-Net and antennas attention (differential privacy i.e. gradient clipping and Gaussian noise). Ten simulated health care institutions were involved in 150 rounds of communication, at a rate of [Formula: see text] participation of the clients. Privacy budget was configured set at [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and a multiplier of noise [Formula: see text] as well as gradient clipping threshold [Formula: see text]. The distance between data heterogeneity was measured with Earth Mover (EMD [Formula: see text]). Experiments are conducted on the BRISC2025 dataset. The Dice similarity coefficient and IoU for Fed-AttUNet-DP is 0.930 and 0.890 respectively, sensitivity is 0.941 and specificity is 0.982. It beats all federated baselines by only [Formula: see text] accuracy drop compared to centralized training as well as [Formula: see text] compared to local-only training. The inference per volume is 0.8 s, converges the system with 5.18 GB total communication cost with 150 rounds. It is verified in the works of the ablation research that attention gates ([Formula: see text] DSC), differential privacy ([Formula: see text] DSC trade-off), and secure aggregation individually contribute to it. Our work provides formal privacy guarantees and advances segmentation accuracy, by mitigating non-IID heterogeneity across multiple medical image institutions and respecting HIPAA/GDPR regulations.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingStrokeAlgorithmsBrainFederated LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPrivacyAttention U-NetBrain stroke segmentationDifferential privacyFed-AttUNet-DPFederated learningMedical image analysisNon-IID datasecure aggregation

Identifiers

PMID42243272
PMCPMC13478167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.