ArticleScientific reports2026
Attention U-Net with differential privacy in federated learning framework for brain stroke lesion segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data privacy considerations and data fragmentation between healthcare institutions is causing segmentation of ischemic stroke lesions from neuroimaging to be hindered. The centralized approach may conflict with HIPAA and GDPR, and the federated learning approach does not have proper privacy guarantees nor is it able to capture lesion detail. This work prposes Fed-AttUNet-DP,a three major contributions: a spatial attention mechanism to integrate federated learning for better stroke lesion detection; differential privacy at the client level and secure MPCC at the server level for dual-layered privacy preservation; adaptive federated optimization for non-IID medical data and faster training speed and better performance. The proposed framework is an augmentation to the federated averaging algorithm which exploits attention U-Net and antennas attention (differential privacy i.e. gradient clipping and Gaussian noise). Ten simulated health care institutions were involved in 150 rounds of communication, at a rate of [Formula: see text] participation of the clients. Privacy budget was configured set at [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and a multiplier of noise [Formula: see text] as well as gradient clipping threshold [Formula: see text]. The distance between data heterogeneity was measured with Earth Mover (EMD [Formula: see text]). Experiments are conducted on the BRISC2025 dataset. The Dice similarity coefficient and IoU for Fed-AttUNet-DP is 0.930 and 0.890 respectively, sensitivity is 0.941 and specificity is 0.982. It beats all federated baselines by only [Formula: see text] accuracy drop compared to centralized training as well as [Formula: see text] compared to local-only training. The inference per volume is 0.8 s, converges the system with 5.18 GB total communication cost with 150 rounds. It is verified in the works of the ablation research that attention gates ([Formula: see text] DSC), differential privacy ([Formula: see text] DSC trade-off), and secure aggregation individually contribute to it. Our work provides formal privacy guarantees and advances segmentation accuracy, by mitigating non-IID heterogeneity across multiple medical image institutions and respecting HIPAA/GDPR regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.