ArticleScientific reports2026
Responsible optimization of long-term production scheduling in open-pit mines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional open-pit production scheduling models often neglect environmental costs, government royalties, and operational penalties, resulting in economically optimistic but practically unrealistic mine plans. This study develops a Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) model for long-term production scheduling at the Kal-e Kafi copper deposit in Iran. The model explicitly integrates environmental costs, government royalties, and penalty costs for deviations from target mill feed tonnage and grade directly into the objective function and block economic value calculation. Implemented on a scaled block model comprising 20,746 selective mining units and solved using the BARON 23.1.7 solver within a Divide and Conquer framework, the MINLP model achieves a net present value of $129.34 million, a stripping ratio of 0.64:1, a mine life of 14 years, and extractable ore tonnage of 14.24 million tonnes. Comparative analysis against the industry-standard Datamine NPV Scheduler reveals that although the commercial software reports a higher nominal NPV, it does so by externalizing environmental liabilities, royalty obligations, and operational penalties. The MINLP model demonstrates comparatively better operational efficiency through a lower stripping ratio, a longer mine life, and higher ore recovery. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis confirms model robustness, with the environmental cost elasticity near zero, indicating that internalizing environmental expenditures does not compromise economic competitiveness. These findings demonstrate that responsible mining produces field-realistic, operationally feasible, and economically defensible mine plans, bridging the gap between theoretical optimization and practical sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.