ArticleScientific reports2026
Academic early warning model based on machine learning and model application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the expansion of higher education, the uncertainty of students' academic completion and the diversity of academic crises have posed new challenges to the management of higher education. This study aims to design and implement a dynamic academic early warning system based on machine learning to predict and intervene in students' academic crises. By analyzing the causes of academic crisis, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with analytic hierarchy process method is used to construct an academic early warning indicator system comprising 10 key indicators. This ensures the scientificity and rationality of the indicator system through expert scoring and consistency test. On this basis, a radial basis function neural network was used to construct an academic early warning model, which outperforms the recurrent neural network and Softmax regression model in terms of prediction accuracy and convergence speed. The system was developed using hypertext markup language, cascading style sheets, JavaScript, and Python to achieve a user-friendly human-computer interaction interface and provide personalized academic alert services. The experimental results demonstrate that the system exhibits high sensitivity and accurate recognition capabilities when dealing with large-scale student datasets, achieving an accuracy rate of 96.32% and a root mean square error of 0.2926, which meets the practical requirements of academic early warning. The results of this study not only provide a new academic early warning tool for colleges, but also have important practical value for promoting the construction of smart campus and digital campus. The current findings, drawn from a sample limited to engineering with an overrepresentation of males, require future validation in multi-disciplinary and gender-balanced cohorts to establish broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.