Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243237›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A smaller and more efficient one-hot encoding for QUBO.

Shinji Takasugi, Hideo Nakaya, Yoshihiro Nakao, Kenta Sawamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shinji TakasugiLG Japan Lab Inc., Yokohama, Japan. shinji.takasugi@lgjlab.com.
Hideo NakayaLG Japan Lab Inc., Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshihiro NakaoLG Japan Lab Inc., Yokohama, Japan.
Kenta SawamuraGraduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

JST SPRING JPMJSP2114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-hot constraints are widely used for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) in quantum and simulated annealing to solve optimization problems. They correspond to exactly-one constraints for Boolean satisfiability problems (SAT), which have many different encodings proposed mainly to reduce SAT problem size. We have examined QUBO encodings, both corresponding to previously proposed SAT encodings and newly invented, to determine the best encoding in terms of QUBO size and solution quality. Our experiments show that reduced commander, our new encoding, gives one of the best trade-offs between QUBO size and solution quality for the benchmark problem studied in this work.

Identifiers

PMID42243237
PMCPMC13478580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.