ArticleScientific reports2026
Weakly-supervised deep learning on pathological whole-slide images for cutaneous vasculitis and its mimickers: a high-performance diagnostic support tool.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous vasculitis represents a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by inflammation and necrosis of blood vessels within the skin, with or without systemic involvement. The pathological diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis remains a significant challenge due to its pathological manifestations overlapping with various inflammatory skin diseases and the inherent subjectivity of manual diagnostic criteria. This study leveraged deep learning technology to develop a reliable diagnostic model for whole slide images (WSIs) of cutaneous vasculitis, aiming to standardize and enhance the consistency of cutaneous vasculitis pathology assessment. The study incorporated WSIs from two medical research centers between 2018 and 2024, comprising 378 WSIs of cutaneous vasculitis, 285 WSIs of edematous dermatitis, 286 WSIs of granulomatous inflammation, and 247 WSIs of panniculitis. To circumvent the substantial resource burden associated with pixel-by-pixel manual annotation of ground truth labels, this study implemented a weakly-supervised learning strategy that required only pathological diagnostic reports as labels. The results demonstrated that the deep learning-based WSI diagnostic model achieved an impressive AUC of 98.39% in multi-classification diagnostic tasks, serving as a standardized adjunct to help mitigate the variability and inconsistency inherent in manual diagnosis. Furthermore, the model can generate diagnostic predictions within milliseconds and highlight regions containing highly suspicious diagnostic evidence, significantly enhancing pathologists' work efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.