ArticleScientific reports2026
Digital twin-based multi-scale framework for seismic integrity assessment of deep underground caverns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep underground caverns have attracted considerable interest in recent years due to their critical role in hydropower and energy infrastructure systems. However, reliable post-earthquake assessment remains challenging due to the complexity of multi-scale seismic response, uncertainty in rock mass properties, and difficulties in interpreting heterogeneous monitoring data. Despite the importance of seismic integrity assessment, there remains a paucity of systematic frameworks that integrate modeling and monitoring in a unified manner. This study therefore proposes a Digital Twin-driven multi-scale framework for seismic integrity assessment of underground caverns, integrating analytical, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional numerical modeling with real-time monitoring data. The aim of this study is to develop a comprehensive framework that enables consistent integration and interpretation of model predictions and monitoring observations. Within this framework, model outputs are defined as Project Intent Information, while monitoring data are defined as Project Status Information, allowing structured comparison through a unified data and knowledge ontology. This study introduces three performance metrics to assess the seismic response, namely the Seismic Integrity Index, Model Consistency Index, and Sensor Consistency Ratio, which collectively provide a quantitative basis for evaluating structural performance and model reliability. In addition, a rule-based multi-sensor consistency logic is developed to distinguish between local anomalies and global structural response, thereby improving the reliability of post-earthquake interpretation. Furthermore, a feedback-based model updating mechanism is implemented to refine numerical models using monitoring-informed interpretation within an integrated Digital Twin-based assessment framework. The proposed approach demonstrates the applicability of an integrated Digital Twin-based framework for model-monitoring-based seismic assessment under the investigated conditions. The results demonstrate that seismic-induced deformation remains limited under high confinement conditions, while the Digital Twin framework enables accurate interpretation of monitoring data and identification of local anomalies. These findings suggest that the proposed approach provides a systematic and scalable methodology for integrating modeling and monitoring in underground seismic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.