ArticleScientific reports2026
Stimulus statistical context sensitivity of deviant responses to auditory intensity changes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mismatch negativity (MMN) is widely used to study sensory function and its clinically-relevant perturbations, and is modulated by the preceding statistical stimulus context, e.g. standard deviation (SD) of tone frequencies. It is unknown whether similar statistical modulation applies to changes in stimulus intensity; whilst MMN is elicited by intensity changes, intensity is encoded differently to other sensory features, including non-topographic organisation, and absence of single-unit responses to intensity decreases. In two related EEG experiments on normal-hearing volunteers (n = 17/15), we replicate findings from other stimulus properties, showing that MMN to intensity deviants is larger within a low-SD stimulus context. However, we found several differences between high- and low- (vs. standard) intensity deviants. Statistical modulation of high-intensity MMN began earlier, and was robust across both experiments. Low-intensity MMN modulation began later, and was only elicited by one of the two experimental paradigms, which we suspect indicates that adaptation over long timescales and/or higher cortical levels may be required for its statistical modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.