ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent emotion and behavior recognition for online learners using deep affective computing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teachers in online classes often have limited visibility into how students are feeling and whether they are staying engaged. This paper presents a practical affective-computing framework that analyses webcam video to recognize both facial emotions and learning-centered behavioral states during live virtual sessions. Student faces are first detected in each frame, then encoded using a convolutional network with an attention module to emphasize informative facial regions. To capture how affect evolves over time, the extracted features are grouped into fixed 16-frame sequences and modelled with a bidirectional GRU to predict four behavioral states: engaged, confused, frustrated and disengaged. We evaluate emotion recognition on the FER2013 benchmark under the standard Train/Public Test/Private Test split, and we evaluate behavior recognition on a publicly available online-learning facial expression dataset (EmoDetect, Kaggle) used for the behavior-recognition experiments from 120 learners (800 annotated temporal segments; inter-annotator agreement κ≈0.75). The proposed model reaches 94.5% accuracy on FER2013 Private Test and achieves 86.9% accuracy with a macro-F1 of 85.4% on the four-class behavior task, improving over facial-expression-only baselines. Profiling further shows that the full pipeline can run at around 25 frames per second on a mid-range GPU, indicating feasibility for real-time monitoring. These results suggest that combining attention-based facial representations with temporal modelling can provide instructors with clearer, webcam-observable indicators of learners' affect and engagement during online teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.