ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of the predictive accuracy of nine staging systems in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter, retrospective study in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are several staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the best prognostic system for Chinese patients has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate nine staging systems and identify the best prognostic staging system for Chinese patients with HCC. This retrospective study included 1,495 patients with HCC from 2012 to 2022 in 17 hospitals in China. The predictive ability of nine HCC staging systems was evaluated based on homogeneity, monotonicity of gradients, Akaike's information criterion, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 59.90%, 40.34%, and 34.83%, respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis identified older age, multiple tumor nodules, maximum tumor size > 5 cm, macrovascular invasion, distant metastases, treatment modalities, worse performance status, low protein, high bilirubin, and high alpha-fetoprotein as independent prognostic factors. The Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) system showed the highest predictive accuracy for Chinese patients in hepatitis B virus-infected populations and in those undergoing non-curative treatment. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program showed the best predictive ability in patients with hepatitis C virus infection or in the curative treatment subgroup. HKLC may be the most consistent and reliable prognostic model for patients with HCC in the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.