Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243076›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2026

Comparison of acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) with and without a supplemental booster dose in healthy participants: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Mélusine Humbert-Droz, Anna M Becker, Jan Valenta, Deborah Rudin, Dino Luethi, Ina Vukalovic, Anne Eckert, Matthias E Liechti, Lorenz Mueller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mélusine Humbert-DrozDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anna M BeckerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-7945
Jan ValentaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7040-1041
Deborah RudinDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dino LuethiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-4875
Ina VukalovicPsychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anne EckertPsychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-3669
Matthias E LiechtiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. matthias.liechti@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-9659
Lorenz MuellerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-1080

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 32003B_185111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AT) is being investigated as a treatment for several psychiatric disorders, particularly posttraumatic stress disorder. Phase 2 and 3 trials typically administered a first dose of MDMA followed by a second "booster" dose 1.5-2.5 h later, to extend the acute effect duration. However, the risks and benefits of the booster dose have not been systematically investigated. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, we compared 120 mg MDMA followed by a 60 mg booster dose or placebo after 2 h, and placebo followed by placebo. The primary outcome was the overall duration of any subjective drug effects, measured by a Visual Analog Scale. Secondary outcomes included additional subjective effects, adverse effects, vital signs, and plasma concentrations of MDMA, oxytocin, and neurophysin I. Twenty-five healthy volunteers were included, and twenty-three (12 male, 11 female) completed all dosing sessions. The booster dose of MDMA prolonged the acute subjective effects of MDMA compared with the single dose (mean ± SD, 5.6 ± 1.8 h vs. 4.6 ± 1.2 h, p = 0.001), while no differences in subjective or autonomic peak effects were observed. Acute (0-9 h) and subacute (up to 3 days) adverse effects were more common after both MDMA conditions than placebo. These results indicate that acute MDMA effects can be prolonged by using a booster dose, as intended in clinical trials of MDMA-AT. Whether this translates into clinical benefit remains to be investigated.

Indexed as

HallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleOxytocinYoung AdultHallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID42243076
PMCPMC13451183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.