ArticleBiomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering2026
Explainable CNN with spatial attention for oral cancer patch selection using a custom scoring metric.
Article in Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to propose an algorithm to select feature-rich patches from histopathology images, eliminating irrelevant regions, to support the computer-aided diagnosis of oral cancer.
methodsTo identify interpretable and diverse feature-rich patches, Haralick and local binary pattern (LBP) features are extracted and cosine similarity is calculated between patches. A trained convolutional neural network (CNN) model with spatial attention, along with a SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) explainer, is used to estimate each patch's contribution using SHAP values. These values, combined with cosine similarity, guide the selection of four patches that significantly influence the diagnosis while ensuring diversity. Features from the selected patches are extracted using a ResNet-50 model, concatenated, and normalized using Z-score normalization. The resulting feature vector is used to classify images as normal or cancerous.
resultsThe approach was tested on a public dataset of 1,224 oral histopathology images from 230 patients, covering 100× and 400× magnifications. It achieved 97.53 % accuracy, 97.68 % precision, and 97.36 % sensitivity using a voting classifier, and 97.93 %, 99.43 %, and 97.76 % respectively with a stacking classifier, outperforming existing cancer detection methods.
conclusionsThe proposed algorithm effectively classifies oral biopsy images with minimal training, enhancing diagnostic reliability and offering valuable support for pathologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42242907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.