ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Micronized Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Reconstruction in Diabetes-Related and Traumatic Foot Wounds With Bone Defects.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate whether micronized acellular dermal matrix (mADM) can be used to treat diabetes-related and traumatic foot wounds with bone defects after bone or joint resection. We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients who underwent bone or joint resection, followed by mADM-assisted reconstruction of diabetes-related or traumatic foot wounds between 2021 and 2024. mADM was applied using sheet-type, paste-type or combined formulations in one- or multi-stage procedures. Wound healing, contour preservation and radiological alignment were assessed. Among the 52 patients (43 with diabetes and 9 with trauma), complete epithelialization was achieved in 48 (mean follow-up: 14.8 months; mean time to wound closure: 5.6 weeks). Four cases showed recurrence or delayed healing and five developed mild early local infection; all were controlled with additional wound care or antibiotics, with no progressive osteomyelitis or graft loss. In 40 radiologically evaluable cases, the toe length and alignment were generally preserved (mean toe length ratio: 91.6% and no angular deformity > 10°). mADM-assisted reconstruction may be useful for treating diabetes-related and traumatic foot wounds with bone defects after bone or joint resection. Its role appears to lie in dead-space management, contour preservation and durable wound coverage, rather than bone replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.