ArticleBMJ global health2026
Severity and management of postabortion complications in Kenya: results from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionComplications from induced abortion are an avoidable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. A nationally representative 2012 study estimated that 37% of postabortion care patients in Kenya experienced severe complications. This study provides updated estimates of postabortion complication management and severity in Kenya.
methodsData were collected on 4666 postabortion care cases in a nationally representative sample of health facilities (n=367). Abortion-related complications were classified as mild, moderate, potentially life-threatening (PLTC) or a severe maternal outcome (SMO). Adjusted Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between patient characteristics and experiencing a PLTC/SMO.
results1.4% (95% CI 0.5% to 3.8%) of cases were classified as a SMO, 16.4% (95% CI 11.8% to 22.3%) as a PLTC, 28.5% (95% CI 21.5% to 36.8%) as moderate and 53.6% (95% CI 45.1% to 62.0%) as mild. Medical vacuum aspiration/electric vacuum aspiration was the most common uterine evacuation method (65.2%, 95% CI 54.0% to 74.9%), and 11.7% of cases (95% CI 7.1% to 18.5%) did not receive any uterine evacuation procedure. Experiencing a PLTC/SMO was associated with primary-level schooling or less (adjusted incidence rate ratio, aIRR 1.86, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.29), inability to meet household needs (aIRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.76), food insecurity (aIRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.24), using a non-recommended abortion method (aIRR 2.56, 95% CI 1.81 to 3.61) and seeking care from another source before arriving at the current facility (aIRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.73).
conclusionsComparing the results of this analysis to the 2012 study reveals that the proportion of postabortion care patients experiencing the most severe outcomes has reduced over time and patients with mild complications more than doubled (from 23% in 2012 to 54% in 2023). This shift is likely a result of expanded primary care and increased access to medication abortion from informal sources. Despite this decline, severe postabortion complications remain an avoidable risk to women who induce abortions. Factors associated with these complications, including use of non-recommended abortion methods and economic vulnerability, underscore the need for interventions that enhance awareness around safe abortion methods and increase access to affordable healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.