ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Development of an artificial intelligence prediction model for moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations using continuous multiple unobtrusive sensors: protocol of a multicentre prospective observational study.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06172712 (COPD Exacerbation Modelling Study Using Daily-life Data From Unobtrusive Sensors - the TOLIFE Clinical Study A), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COPD Exacerbation Modelling Study Using Daily-life Data From Unobtrusive Sensors - the TOLIFE Clinical Study A
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExacerbations, impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and reduced exercise capacity increase the risk of hospitalisations and death in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, their monitoring relies on in-person assessments, potentially delaying early care. While smart sensing technologies can enable remote monitoring, their use in predicting disease worsening remains limited. The TOLIFE Clinical Study A (CSA) aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model integrating clinical data with smart sensing devices data to predict exacerbation onset and changes in HRQoL, dyspnoea and exercise capacity in people with COPD. METHODS AND ANALYSES: TOLIFE CSA is a longitudinal observational study that will recruit 150 clinically stable people with COPD from three clinical sites in Spain, Italy and Germany. Over 1 year, participants will attend quarterly in-person visits to collect clinical data, while being continuously monitored using six unobtrusive smart sensing devices collecting daily metrics calculated from triaxial acceleration, angular velocity, photoplethysmogram, sound intensity, changes in latitude and longitude, ambient light intensity, biomechanical pressure and respiratory airflow parameters. Clinical outcomes are exacerbation onset through medical records; 3-month changes in HRQoL through the COPD Assessment Test and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire; 3-month changes in dyspnoea severity through the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale; and 6-month changes in functional exercise capacity through the 6-minute walk test. We will train, internally validate and test AI-based models (Random Forests, XGBoost, multilayer perceptrons, cumulative link model and standard classification model) to predict clinical outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was issued for all sites by the Ethical Commission (EC) of the Medical Association of Schleswig-Holstein (Bad Segeberg; vote 074/23 ff), EC of the Tuscany Region-North West Area (Pisa; vote CET10/2023) and EC of Parc de Salut Mar (Barcelona; vote 2023/11230). All participants will sign a written informed consent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06172712.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.