ArticleBMJ open2026
Exploring the needs of technical developers and stakeholders in point-of-care technology development: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPoint-of-care technologies (POCTs) are essential to providing clinical care for patients, with their potential for rapid and accurate results on site supporting efficient clinical decision-making.
objectivesTo understand the current key needs, barriers and challenges of POCT developers for effective development and implementation of POCTs across diverse settings particularly in the domain of cancer, nutrition and infections.
designA qualitative semi-structured focus group discussion (FGDs) was employed. The FGDs were guided by the needs assessment process and the Phase Gate Framework. The qualitative data were coded and analysed in NVivo and refined into various themes.
settingThe study was conducted in person at Cornell Tech Campus in May 2024, New York, USA.
participants24 participants were purposively sampled from the PORTENT (Point-of-Care Technologies for Nutrition, Infection and Cancer) network. Participants included technical developers (eg, engineers, scientists, startup leads) and expert stakeholders (eg, funders, policy advisors, clinicians and academic partners) involved in POCT development, evaluation and implementation.
resultsA total of 24 participants participated in the in-person FGDs in New York (n=24). Key themes identified included gaps in stakeholder engagement, limited regulatory preparedness, insufficient market analysis, challenges in scaling and manufacturing and the need for context-specific adaptation in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. Participants emphasised the importance of user-centred and context-responsive design, strategic partnerships and early planning for regulatory and implementation pathways.
conclusionsTechnical developers and expert stakeholders in the POCT landscape face various barriers to efficient and effective development and implementation of POCTs. It is important to consider their needs when adapting POCTs in LMICs and diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.