ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
CSIE: cancer subtyping via inference and ensemble.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While multi-omics integration is the gold standard for precision oncology, its clinical utility is severely hampered by the incomplete data problem, where cost and technical barriers often leave researchers with only single-omics profiles. Our manuscript introduces CSIE (cancer subtyping via inference and ensemble), a framework that bridges this gap by using a novel transformer-based inference module which incorporates systems-level knowledge to accurately infer missing omics layers from gene expression data. Furthermore, CSIE employs an ensemble clustering module that simultaneously integrates multi-omics data via different similarity metrics and clustering algorithms to capture molecular patterns of cancer subtypes. The robustness of CSIE is validated through extensive benchmarking against 12 state-of-the-art methods across 66 cancer datasets with over 15 000 patients and 22 diverse data modalities/platforms. Our results demonstrate that CSIE significantly outperforms existing tools, particularly in scenarios with incomplete data. This work shifts the paradigm from requiring exhaustive data collection to leveraging biological intelligence for data completion, offering a scalable solution for high-resolution cancer subtyping in real-world clinical settings. All source code of CSIE and scripts for regenerating results reported in this article are available at https://github.com/tinnlab/CSIE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.