Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42242677›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Quality Improvement Competencies for Health Care Quality Professionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Nurhayati Shaharuddin, Khalidah Maruan, Divya Nair Narayanan, Normaizira Hamidi, Nurul Izzaty Bahar, Roslina Supadi, Mariyah Mohamad, Samsiah Awang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nurhayati ShaharuddinInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0009-1175-5197
Khalidah MaruanInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3991-1237
Divya Nair NarayananInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0008-3604-2137
Normaizira HamidiInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0009-8493-8197
Nurul Izzaty BaharInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0002-4187-7207
Roslina SupadiInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0008-8698-7040
Mariyah MohamadInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0002-9945-555X
Samsiah AwangInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0008-4554-864X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care professionals play a crucial role in executing, supporting, and assessing quality improvement programs. Clearly defined competencies in health care quality are essential for optimal performance and serve as the foundation for both quality practice and the design of a capacity development program.

objectiveThis study aims to identify and explore the requisite health care quality professional competencies in implementing quality improvement initiatives.

methodsThe study will apply a validated scoping review methodology and the JBI recommendations. An extensive search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases will be conducted. Gray literature documents will be identified by searching selected Ministry of Health websites in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and World Health Organization regions with National Quality Policy and Strategy, as well as the Google search engine, using keywords related to quality improvement competencies. The study approach will be reported using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). Data will be systematically extracted into a matrix using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analysis will subsequently be conducted using inductive thematic analysis and narrative synthesis.

resultsThis scoping review has commenced, and the search strategy has been developed. Preliminary searches conducted in November 2025 through selected electronic databases and gray literature identified 5339 records. Study selection, data extraction, and inductive thematic analysis are scheduled in July 2026 to November 2026. The final findings of this scoping reviews are anticipated to be ready for publication by December 2026. The findings of this study will inform future, larger-scale studies aimed at developing a competency framework for quality improvement among health care quality professionals.

conclusionsConducting this scoping review will provide relevant evidence regarding the quality improvement competencies required for health care quality professionals. The results will provide valuable insights to stakeholders in identifying and prioritizing the competencies necessary to enhance the quality improvement skills of health care quality professionals in Malaysia. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/88787.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth PersonnelQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topiccompetencieshealth care quality professionalsprofessional competencequality improvementscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42242677
PMCPMC13280533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.