ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2026
Fully self-gated dual-venc five-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous imaging of the cardiovascular and portal venous systems: A feasibility study.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate a fully self-gated dual-venc five-dimensional (5D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique for joint assessment of cardiovascular and portal venous hemodynamics under free breathing.
methodsA dual-venc 5D flow sequence using a spiral-in Cartesian sampling trajectory was implemented. Cardiac and respiratory motion were retrospectively resolved using principal component analysis of self-gating signals, followed by total variation regularized reconstruction. The technique was first tested in a custom-built phantom with steady flow and stationary parts, and compared with conventional four-dimensional (4D) flow. It was then evaluated in healthy volunteers and in patients with cirrhosis or portal hypertension, including post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) cases. No contrast agent was administered for either the phantom or in vivo scans, with an in vivo 5D flow scan time of approximately 15 min per subject. Hemodynamic parameters in both the cardiovascular and portal venous systems were quantified and compared with conventional breath-held, ECG-triggered two-dimensional (2D) phase-contrast (PC) MRI. For each subject, flow internal consistency (IC) across vessel planes and respiration-resolved flow variations were also computed.
resultsPhantom experiments demonstrated an average 67% improvement in velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR) and similar flow quantification compared with fully sampled 4D flow MRI. In vivo evaluation included 12 healthy volunteers, 8 cirrhosis patients, and 9 post-TIPS patients. Across all cohorts, dual-venc 5D flow achieved substantial VNR enhancement (approximately 200% on average), high flow IC (>82%), and strong agreement with 2D PC MRI for both peak and net flow (bias <10%). Respiration-resolved analysis revealed a consistent increase in net flow in the main pulmonary artery (MPA), right pulmonary artery (RPA), and superior vena cava (SVC) during inspiration, along with elevated SVC peak flow.
conclusionsFully self-gated dual-venc 5D flow MRI enables simultaneous, respiration-resolved quantification of cardiovascular and portal venous hemodynamics within a clinically feasible scan time and with high VNR. This technique provides a promising tool for characterizing systemic hemodynamics in cirrhosis and for evaluating portal-systemic circulatory interactions following TIPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.