Trial reportAnnals of epidemiology2026
What happens at the postpartum visit? Discordance between patient-reported and electronic medical record-documented postpartum care.
Trial report in Annals of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine discordance between postpartum care reported by patients and documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR).
methodsWe analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of pregnant patients with cardiometabolic risk factors (n = 282). Concordance between self-report and EMR documentation was assessed for outpatient postpartum visits within 12 weeks and selected elements (mood disorder screening, diabetes testing, counseling). We fit multivariable log binomial models to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between age, parity, and discordant reporting, adjusting for intervention assignment.
resultsOverall, 74.7% of participants had concordant documentation of a postpartum visit between self-report and EMR, 20.5% had care documented on only one (19.7% EMR only, 0.8% self-report only), and 4.8% concordant documentation of no care. Participants > 34 years were half as likely to have discordant report of a visit compared to participants ages 20-34 (RR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.9). Primiparous participants were slightly less likely than multiparous participants to have discordant reporting (RR: 0.7 (0.4, 1.2)). Patterns were similar for diabetes testing, mood screening, and cardiovascular risk counseling, though documentation was less common (1.1%, 62.7%, 31.6% concordant).
conclusionsWe found disagreement between self-report and EMR-documentation of postpartum care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.