Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241950›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2026

Enhanced prognostic score for breast cancer brain metastases incorporating contemporary clinical features and leptomeningeal disease: Development and validation.

Yun Hwa Roh, Dongyeong Kim, Ho Sung Kim, Seo Young Park, Shinkyo Yoon, Jae Ho Jeong, Sang Woo Song, Young-Hoon Kim, Young Hyun Cho, Beomseok Sohn and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yun Hwa RohDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dongyeong KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho Sung KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: radhskim@gmail.com.
Seo Young ParkDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shinkyo YoonDepartment of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Ho JeongDepartment of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Woo SongDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Hyun ChoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Beomseok SohnDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Eun ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jieunp@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrognosis of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) remains heterogeneous. The current Breast-Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) lacks leptomeningeal disease (LMD) or contemporary clinical features. We aimed to develop and externally validate an enhanced prognostic scoring system integrating clinical factors, cancer subtypes, and LMD.

methodsIn this retrospective multi-institutional study, 207 patients with newly diagnosed BCBM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery between 2015 and 2021 formed the development cohort. 240 patients formed the external validation cohort. Clinical variables, GPA factors, and magnetic resonance imaging-based features including number of metastases, volumetric tumor burden, and LMD presence were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression identified independent predictors for overall survival (OS). A weighted point-based scoring system (enhanced GPA, eGPA) was constructed and compared with the GPA using Harrell's C-index and time-dependent area under the curve.

resultsMedian OS in the development cohort was 13.9 months. Multivariable analysis identified Karnofsky performance status, breast cancer subtype, number of brain metastases, presence of extracranial metastasis, and LMD as independent prognostic factors (all P < .05). Total metastatic volume was not independently associated with OS. The eGPA demonstrated superior discrimination compared with GPA in the development cohort (C-index 0.64 vs. 0.60, P = .009) and comparable performance in the external validation cohort (0.65 vs. 0.66, P = .690). One-year AUC was higher for eGPA (0.71 vs. 0.65, P = .014). The inclusion of LMD provided meaningful risk stratification across subtypes.

conclusionAn enhanced GPA incorporating LMD and contemporary clinical factors improves risk assessment in BCBM and may better guide therapeutic decision-making prior to radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsMeningeal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenBrain metastasesBreast cancerLeptomeningeal diseasePrognostic scoreRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID42241950
PMCPMC13254852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.