ArticleCytotherapy2026
Successful autologous T cell apheresis in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and brain tumors.
Article in Cytotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is being used to target a range of pediatric cancers. Starting materials are critical for successful CAR T cell manufacturing, most often obtained via autologous mononuclear cell (auto-MNC) apheresis. While apheresis strategies are established for patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), these approaches are not standardized and there are limited data on how these practices apply across other disease groups. Here, we report our experience with apheresis for CAR T cell production across various pediatric cancer diagnoses.
methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective analysis of auto-MNC apheresis events. Parameters for apheresis suitability included peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) ≥300 cells/µL and CD3+ ≥150 cells/µL. Meeting apheresis goal was defined as postprocessing yield within 90% of target (2 × 10
resultsWe evaluated 151 auto-MNC apheresis collections from 138 unique patients diagnosed with ALL (n = 80), AML (n = 23), lymphoma (n = 2), solid tumor (n = 16), or brain tumor (n = 17). The median age at time of apheresis collection was 11.7 years (range 1.4-23.5), and the median amount of blood processed was 1.9 (range 0.8-8.2) total blood volumes (TBV), with no statistically significant difference in TBV processed between disease groups (P = 0.218). Overall, 87% of patients met both total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD3+ goals, with no statistically significant differences across disease groups in univariate or multivariate analyses. Collection efficiency was not impacted by burden of peripheral blasts among patients with leukemia. In multivariate analysis, increasing age was associated with increased odds of successful apheresis (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.32), while odds of successful collection decreased with increasing baseline white blood cell count (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99). Subsequent CAR T cell manufacturing was successful in 127 of 129 procedures (98.4%).
conclusionsWe report that auto-MNC apheresis collection criteria can be applied across an array of pediatric oncologic indications, resulting in highly successful apheresis and subsequent manufacturing campaigns without significant differences between disease groups. Age and baseline WBC count may influence successful apheresis, but overall low failure rates limit current risk factor analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.