ArticleInternal medicine journal2026
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis update, comparing the Australasian Interstitial Lung Disease Registry to the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsReal-world evaluation of clinical characteristics and treatment profile of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is needed to establish areas for improvement according to evidence-based recommendations. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment profile of patients with IPF from the Australasian ILD Registry (AILDR), comparing them to the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR) cohort, to identify differences in baseline characteristics among IPF patients treated with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants.
methodsConsecutive patients with IPF enrolled between May 2016 and December 2023 from the AILDR and data of patients enrolled in the AIPFR between 2012 and 2016 were included.
resultsA total of 842 and 647 patients with IPF were included from the AILDR and the AIPFR respectively. Both cohorts were male predominant (AILDR: 72.0%; AIPFR: 67.7%) of similar mean body mass index (AILDR: 29.2 ± 4.9 kg/m
conclusionBaseline demographics from the IPF cohorts for both AILDR and AIPFR are largely comparable, with increasing antifibrotic and decreasing use of immunosuppressants since 2016. Immunosuppressive therapy in IPF remains relatively higher than expected despite guideline recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.