ArticleInternal medicine journal2026
Experience of Australian rheumatologists managing polymyalgia rheumatica: results from a national survey.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolymyalgia rheumatica is the commonest inflammatory condition affecting adults over 50 years of age, however it has been under-researched and management varies in everyday clinical practice.
aimThis national survey of rheumatologists and trainees managing polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in Australia sought to determine current diagnostic and management approaches and establish a baseline for future development of a disease-specific clinical care standard.
methodsFollowing ethics approval, an online survey was circulated to the membership of the Australian Rheumatology Association. Relevant demographic information about respondents was collected, along with answers to multiple-choice questions on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, management and prognosis of PMR. Free-text responses were also permitted at the end of each section. The survey remained open between 25 March 2022 and 11 November 2022. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics for multiple-choice questions and thematic analysis for free-text responses.
resultsSeventy-nine clinicians completed the survey, of whom the majority were qualified rheumatologists who regularly managed patients with PMR. Most respondents relied upon clinical diagnosis, but some did not recognise peripheral joint involvement or normal inflammatory markers as possible features of PMR. Access to imaging investigations like
conclusionVariability remains in the diagnosis and management of PMR among Australian clinicians, with gaps in recognition of atypical presentations, imaging access and incorporation of physical therapy, ultimately supporting the need for standardised, evidence-based clinical care guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.