Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241572›Full record

Trial reportEuropean stroke journal2026

Oedema reduction mediates thrombectomy benefit in large core stroke: secondary analysis of the TENSION trial.

Gabriel Broocks, Martin Bendszus, Claus Z Simonsen, Götz Thomalla, Elke R Gizewski, Anne Hege Aamodt, Antonin Krajina, Laurent Pierot, Kamil Zeleňák, Blanca Fuentes and 10 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Gabriel BroocksDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7575-9850
Martin BendszusUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg, National Coordinating Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-6769
Claus Z SimonsenAarhus University Hospital, National Coordinating Center, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1363-0266
Götz ThomallaDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4785-1449
Elke R GizewskiDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, National Coordinating Center, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-8377
Anne Hege AamodtOslo University Hospital, National Coordinating Center, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-2760
Antonin KrajinaCharles University, Hradec Králové, National Coordinating Center, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0876-9167
Laurent PierotCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, National Coordinating Center, Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2523-4909
Kamil ZeleňákJessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and University Hospital Martin, National Coordinating Center, Martin, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-2985
Blanca FuentesLa Paz University Hospital, National Coordinating Center, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0363-862X
Michael D HillUniversity of Calgary, National Coordinating Center, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-1543
Andre KemmlingDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8930-1894
Lieselotte VandewalleDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0375-3804
Anke WoutersDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5229-2699
Robin LemmensDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-5956
Jelle DemeestereDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-0237
Susanne GellißenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-7265
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8533-7478
Lukas MeyerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-638X
Helge KniepDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5258-2370

Funding

EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 754640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral recent trials have shown improved functional outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients presenting with large ischaemic lesions, yet the impact of reperfusion on lesion pathophysiology in this population remains incompletely understood. We hypothesised that EVT reduces ischaemic oedema formation and that attenuation of oedema mediates functional outcome improvement beyond changes in lesion extent.

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of the randomised TENSION trial, which enrolled patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke and baseline ASPECTS 3-5. Oedema progression was quantified as the change in CT-based net water uptake between baseline and follow-up non-contrast CT (ΔNWU), derived from relative hypoattenuation within the infarct. Lesion extent change was assessed by the difference in ASPECTS between baseline and follow-up imaging (ΔASPECTS). Associations of ΔNWU and ΔASPECTS with 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were tested using ordinal logistic regression. Mediation analyses estimated the proportion of EVT's treatment effect on functional outcome explained by ΔNWU and ΔASPECTS.

resultsAmong 177 patients, median follow-up NWU was 28.5% (IQR: 19.2-36.6) and follow-up ASPECTS was 2 (IQR: 1-3). EVT was associated with substantially lower oedema progression (ΔNWU 4.7% vs 15.9% without EVT; P < .001). Mediation analysis suggested that a model-estimated 34% of EVT-related improvement in mRS was associated with reduced oedema formation (ΔNWU), whereas 14% was associated with lesion extent change (ΔASPECTS). In a sensitivity analysis using nonparametric bootstrap with 5000 resamples, the mediation signal remained robust for ΔNWU but was substantially weaker for ΔASPECTS.

conclusionIn large-core stroke, EVT was associated with significantly attenuated oedema progression between baseline and follow-up imaging. Reduced ischaemic water uptake was strongly associated with EVT benefit on 90-day functional outcome in mediation models, supporting oedema attenuation as a plausible mechanistic pathway of EVT benefit.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaIschemic StrokeStrokeThrombectomyAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeimagingoedemastrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID42241572
PMCPMC13235715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.