Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241481›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026

Helping Patients With Persecutory Delusions Find Safety.

Daniel Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel FreemanDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2541-2197

Funding

Department of HealthNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research CentreNIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research NIHR204013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the heart of a persecutory delusion is an incorrect perception of threat from others. This makes the person feel very unsafe. Overcoming such delusions therefore means establishing a sense of safety, and thus a realisation that there is no current threat. Discovering that one is safe functions as the counterweight to feeling unsafe. The counterweight shifts expectations and changes beliefs. In this article, we describe how safety may be learned. This includes how to engage patients, framing the finding of safety, switching from threat to safety mode, using experiential learning, and consideration of blocking beliefs that may prevent new learning. Key points are to: frame intervention as an opportunity to find greater safety in the world so that meaningful activities can be resumed; repeatedly measure the learning of safety; make new benign associations with the internal and external cues driving the delusions; keep the new learning to the present and future, suitably circumscribed for an individual, so that potential for discord is limited; carry out safety-establishing behavioral experiments that allow for the dropping of defense behaviors, the reframing of evidence for the delusion, and diminish the pervasiveness of the perceived threat; and help patients move from situation-specific instances of safety to more generalised belief change. Enabling patients to re-discover safety in their everyday lives-decisively tipping the scales in favor of the counterweight-is the most transformational element of successful psychological intervention for persecutory delusions.

Indexed as

DelusionsHumansdelusionspersecutorytreatmentunderstanding

Identifiers

PMID42241481
PMCPMC13235722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.