Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241441›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Disability and educational outcomes in Nepal: Evidence from the 2019 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.

Prashant Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Prashant AcharyaBodh Insight, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2438-9139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited evidence on how disability affects children's educational outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, particularly during adolescence. This study aims to examine the association between disability and various educational outcomes for children ages 5-17 in Nepal. This study uses a nationally representative sample of 7,824 children ages 5-17 surveyed in the 2019 Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. In the survey, functional disability was measured as a binary variable (=1 if the respondent reported having a functional disability, 0 otherwise). The key educational outcomes examined are the following: (1) whether the child ever attended school (binary), (2) current grade level (continuous), and (3) whether the child is in the appropriate grade for their age (binary). The association between disability status and the outcomes was examined in a regression framework controlling for age, gender, geographic location, mother's education, and household wealth index. Among 7,790 children with complete data, approximately 13.7% children reported having a functional disability. After adjusting for potential confounders, having a disability was associated with a 2.7 percentage point reduction in the likelihood of ever attending school (p < 0.001). Likewise, having a disability was associated with the completion of 0.21 fewer grades on average (p < 0.001). Having a disability was not associated with reaching the appropriate grade level for age (p = 0.64). Children with disabilities were 13.5 percentage points more likely to report facing difficulties adjusting to routine changes in their daily activities (p < 0.001). These findings highlight persistent educational disadvantages among children with disabilities in Nepal and underscore the need to create inclusive learning environments and support systems to promote equitable access to education and reduce educational inequalities.

Identifiers

PMID42241441
PMCPMC13235914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.