Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241420›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Tool-stone selection in the African Middle stone age at Sibhudu cave.

Patrick Schmidt, Klaus G Nickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick SchmidtPetrology and Mineral Resources, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-6127
Klaus G NickelApplied Mineralogy, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6986-2982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The raw materials people used for making stone tools may contain information about their territory, exchange routs or the selection criteria they employed during provisioning. In this study, we measure the mechanical properties of different tool-stones used by foragers living during the Middle Stone Age at Sibhudu Cave in South Africa. The site yielded a long and continuous sequence that saw transitions between different raw materials and tool forms. We evaluate the quality of these different stones for tool making and use, attempting to find correlations between selected raw materials and the tools made from them. We find that the raw materials used at Sibhudu have substantially different qualities, some being easy to flake but weak upon use, some being tough during stone knapping and resistant during use. Comparing these data with the appearance and disappearance of tool types throughout the Sibhudu sequence, we note that tool-stones requiring lower flaking forces were more often retouched than those requiring great forces. Elongated products, blades, were mostly made from materials with better fracture predictability, suggesting an understanding of the basic requirements for standardising the tool knapping process. Use-related qualities, such as resistance to dulling, appear to have been of lesser importance at Sibhudu. Our results suggest that the site's occupants had a good understanding of the qualities of rocks for specific knapping processes.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyCavesTool Use BehaviorHumansSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID42241420
PMCPMC13235935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.