ArticlePloS one2026
Comparison of fish biomass and fish carbon content associated with reef sites at the Rio Grande Valley artificial reef in the Gulf of Mexico.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global fisheries stocks have decreased due to overfishing and climate change, artificial reefs have gained significant attention. In addition to providing or restoring habitat, artificial reefs may serve as carbon capture sinks and potential climate mitigation strategies. The Rio Grande Valley (RGV) Reef is an artificial reef located in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Texas. The RGV Reef area spans 1,650 acres and is comprised of hundreds of groupings of recycled and pre-formed materials ranging from low relief (1-2 ft) to high relief (8-30 ft) reef structures. This reef provides a variety of novel habitat stepping-stones for multiple fish species at different life stages and supports local fisheries. Since the deployment of reef structures, fish biomass and abundance are substantially higher than expected for unconsolidated soft-bottom habitats; however, quantifying fish biomass is necessary to evaluate the relative effectiveness of different structural types. For this study, a Simrad EK80 split-beam sonar was used to estimate fish biomass at the reef sites. Biomass was calculated using fish echo returns and length-weight relationships. The standing stock of fish carbon contained within the fish populations associated with the RGV Reef was assessed using literature-derived measurements. The total fish biomass within the RGV Reef area was estimated at 24.4 tons, equating to 2.81 metric tons of carbon within the fish population. This study provides important information on the factors influencing fish biomass in this reef and the amount of carbon held in fish biomass within a previously overlooked potential blue carbon ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.