Trial reportPloS one2026
Catheter body-surface fixation after transurethral prostate resection: A low-value nursing practice as evidenced in a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial is aimed at evaluating whether external fixation of the urinary catheter to the body surface represents a low-value nursing intervention for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). A total of 208 patients who received indwelling urinary catheters after TURP in a tertiary hospital in Qingdao, China between June 2024 and May 2025 were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a nonexternal fixation group (n = 103) and an external body surface fixation group (n = 105). A between-group comparison of outcomes included postoperative hematuria, incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), unplanned catheter removal, occurrence of urinary catheter-related meatal pressure injury (UCR-MPI), and associated economic costs. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative hematuria or CAUTI incidence (P > 0.05). Unplanned catheter removal did not occur in either group. However, UCR-MPI occurred significantly more frequently in the external fixation group (9 patients) than it did in the nonexternal fixation group (1 patient) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the external fixation group incurred higher costs for personnel and consumables. External fixation of the urinary catheter to the body surface after TURP is associated with increased economic costs, reduced patient comfort, and a higher incidence of UCR-MPI, which indicates that it constitutes a low-value nursing practice. Nonexternal fixation appears to be a safe and effective alternative for post-TURP patients undergoing early mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.