Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241379›Full record

Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026

[Visual field index and pituitary tumors resected by microsurgical transsphenoidal approach].

Leticia Guadalupe Segura-Campillo, Erika Dalila Ascencio-Gil, Luz Ma Adriana Balderas-Peña, Abraham Reynoso-Topete

Abstract readEnglish AbstractObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leticia Guadalupe Segura-CampilloInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Neurocirugía. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0009-0001-0879-4664
Erika Dalila Ascencio-GilInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Neurocirugía. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-6288
Luz Ma Adriana Balderas-PeñaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Hospital de Especialidades, Unidad de Investigación Biomédica 02. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5052-457X
Abraham Reynoso-TopeteInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Radiología. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0009-0003-5016-1064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pituitary adenomas are the third most common intracranial tumor. Due to their growth, they may cause endocrine disturbances, compression, and visual deficits, particularly visual field defects. The Visual Field Index (VFI) is an objective parameter that accurately quantifies visual improvement or deterioration. Transsphenoidal resection is the first-line treatment; therefore, pre- and postoperative visual assessment is essential for follow-up and prognosis. Objective: To correlate pre- and postoperative VFI in patients with pituitary adenomas who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal surgery at the Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients operated on between January 2020 and January 2024 was conducted, including those with pre- and postoperative automated perimetry. Both sexes and all ages were included, provided they had complete medical records, magnetic resonance imaging, and visual field testing. VFI values were compared using descriptive and correlational analyses. Results: Thirty-two patients were analyzed (mean age 54 years); 29 had comorbidities, with hypothyroidism being the most common (56%). The most frequent visual deficit was bitemporal hemianopia (60%). In the right eye, the mean VFI increased from 50.1% to 56.1% (p = 0.002); the median increased from 55% to 68.5% (p = 0.001). In the left eye, the mean changed from 54.6% to 56.7% (p = 0.472); the median from 55.5% to 64.5% (p = 0.537). A greater proportion of improvement was observed in the right eye. In diabetic patients, a reduction in left-eye VFI was noted. Conclusions: Postoperative VFI showed an overall increase following microscopic transsphenoidal resection, supporting its usefulness as a practical and objective parameter for evaluating visual function.

Indexed as

AdenomaMicrosurgeryPituitary NeoplasmsVision DisordersVisual FieldsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVisual Field TestsYoung AdultAdenomaNeurosurgical ProceduresProcedimientos NeuroquirúrgicosPruebas del Campo VisualVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID42241379
PMCPMC13275044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.