ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[High diagnostic discrepancy in infectious diseases detected by autopsy].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autopsies are considered the gold standard for determining the cause of death. Infections are among the leading causes of death, and many are only identified through autopsy. Such studies are lacking in Mexico. Objective: To compare the frequency of diagnostic discrepancies, particularly those related to infections identified premortem, in patients from the Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, during the period from 2014 to 2021. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted. Autopsy reports from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed to identify cases with infectious diagnoses determined postmortem. Premortem diagnoses were obtained from clinical records. Two clinical reviewers classified the diagnostic discrepancies. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient and comparison were performed using the Chi-square test. Results: Of 164 autopsies, 70 cases (43%) revealed at least one infection as either the primary or a contributing cause of death. Diagnostic discrepancies were identified in 52% of patients with infections and in 70% of patients living with HIV. The most frequent infectious disease was pneumonia, while cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Candida were the most commonly underdiagnosed infections. Conclusions: Diagnostic discrepancies are present in more than half of the patients with infectious diseases. The HIV-positive population has the highest rate of diagnostic discrepancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.