ArticleThe British journal of radiology2026
A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio of liver tumors between dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and respiration-tracked 4D-CT for radiotherapy targeting.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe compare the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of tumors on 4D-CT and DCE-CT and explore how DCE-CT can be used to enhance tumor delineation for radiotherapy targeting.
methodsA total of 18 intrahepatic lesions from 15 patients were included in this study. Eight patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma, and 7 metastatic patients with a total of 10 tumors, underwent DCE-CT and respiration-tracked 4D-CT. Both 4D-CT and DCE-CT were acquired at 120 kVp, but with 600 and 1920 mAs, respectively. CNRs were calculated for each lesion in each image set and compared using a paired t-test.
resultsDCE-CT image sets had CNRs that were higher than those of 4D-CT image sets. The improvement in CNR was significant for lesions that were metastatic rather than primary, for lesions that were smaller than the mean size (5.7 cm), and for lesions that had undergone prior treatment rather than those that had not.
conclusionsTarget volume delineation in liver radiotherapy is challenging due to the inherent low tumor CNR. DCE-CT significantly improves CNR in liver metastases compared to 4D-CT, the current standard for radiation treatment planning. Considerations for DCE-CT include patients with metastatic lesions, additional iodinated contrast, and CT dose. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DCE-CT combined with 4D-CT can offer advantages in delineating small, previously-treated metastatic tumors for radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.