Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42241093›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026

Parental motivations, facilitators, and barriers to participating in a pediatric vaccine trial in Kathmandu, Nepal: A qualitative study.

Charlie Firth, Neha Kumari Das, Erina Khatri, Sanjeev Bijukchhe, Sachi Chuke, Benjamin Curtis, Meeru Gurung, Sarah Kelly, Elizabeth O'Mahony, Andrew J Pollard and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Charlie FirthOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-6880-6675
Neha Kumari DasPediatric Research Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Erina KhatriDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sanjeev BijukchheOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sachi ChukeDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Benjamin CurtisOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Meeru GurungPediatric Research Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Sarah KellyOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elizabeth O'MahonyOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew J PollardOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Arun Kumar SharmaDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shrijana ShresthaPediatric Research Unit, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Samantha VanderslottOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Bipin AdhikariMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric vaccine trials are essential for generating evidence to inform immunization policy, yet their success depends on effective recruitment and sustained participation of children and their caregivers. Understanding parental decision-making is particularly important in low- and middle-income countries, where sociocultural dynamics, trust, and access to healthcare may shape willingness to participate in research. This qualitative study explored parental motivations, facilitators, and barriers to participation in a pediatric vaccine clinical trial conducted in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 parents whose children were enrolled in the OptImms trial, a randomized study evaluating alternative diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTwP) immunization schedules. Interviews were conducted in Nepali, transcribed, translated, and analyzed thematically. Trust in healthcare workers, research institutions, and scientific processes emerged as a central facilitator of participation. Social dynamics, including joint decision-making within families and reassurance from relatives working in healthcare, strongly influenced enrollment decisions. Practical facilitators, such as efficient scheduling, access to additional healthcare, and reimbursement for travel costs, further supported participation. Barriers included time constraints, geographical distance, and concerns about invasive procedures, such as blood sampling. These findings highlight the importance of trust-building, culturally sensitive communication, and logistical support in the ethical design and implementation of pediatric vaccine trials. Addressing these factors may improve recruitment and retention in future vaccine trials in Nepal and similar settings.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicMotivationParentsAdultChildChild, PreschoolDecision MakingFemaleHumansInfantInterviews as TopicMaleNepalQualitative ResearchLMICsNepalparental decision-makingqualitative researchtrial participationtrustVaccine trials

Identifiers

PMID42241093
PMCPMC13240966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.