ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Parental motivations, facilitators, and barriers to participating in a pediatric vaccine trial in Kathmandu, Nepal: A qualitative study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric vaccine trials are essential for generating evidence to inform immunization policy, yet their success depends on effective recruitment and sustained participation of children and their caregivers. Understanding parental decision-making is particularly important in low- and middle-income countries, where sociocultural dynamics, trust, and access to healthcare may shape willingness to participate in research. This qualitative study explored parental motivations, facilitators, and barriers to participation in a pediatric vaccine clinical trial conducted in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 parents whose children were enrolled in the OptImms trial, a randomized study evaluating alternative diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTwP) immunization schedules. Interviews were conducted in Nepali, transcribed, translated, and analyzed thematically. Trust in healthcare workers, research institutions, and scientific processes emerged as a central facilitator of participation. Social dynamics, including joint decision-making within families and reassurance from relatives working in healthcare, strongly influenced enrollment decisions. Practical facilitators, such as efficient scheduling, access to additional healthcare, and reimbursement for travel costs, further supported participation. Barriers included time constraints, geographical distance, and concerns about invasive procedures, such as blood sampling. These findings highlight the importance of trust-building, culturally sensitive communication, and logistical support in the ethical design and implementation of pediatric vaccine trials. Addressing these factors may improve recruitment and retention in future vaccine trials in Nepal and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.