Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240998›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2026

Smartphone-Based Proactive Self-Screening for Ocular Surface Malignancies: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Ruixin Wang, Shaowei Bi, Duoru Lin, Mingyuan Li, Lanqin Zhao, Yukun Zhou, Ling Jin, Wenben Chen, Ruiyang Li, Yuanjun Shang and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05645341 (Artificial Intelligence-assisted Screening of Malignant Pigmented Tumors on the Ocular Surface), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05645341 completednot on this map

Artificial Intelligence-assisted Screening of Malignant Pigmented Tumors on the Ocular Surface

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled535ConditionsOrbital Neoplasms, Conjunctival Neoplasms, Eye NeoplasmsArmsscreening system for ocular surface malignant tumors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Ruixin WangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Shaowei BiZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Duoru LinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Mingyuan LiZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Lanqin ZhaoZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yukun ZhouInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ling JinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wenben ChenZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ruiyang LiZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanjun ShangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Huasheng YangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Rongxin ChenZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wei XiaoZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Siming AiZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Jianbing LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shiqi LingDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohang WuZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Zhixiong LiShenzhen Eye Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Guiqin LiuShenzhen Eye Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yinyue LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Wen LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Huiying RaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiangda MengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hua YanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Cong NieFoshan First People's Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Min ZhuFoshan First People's Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Huijing YeZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Haotian LinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Ocular surface malignancies pose risks to vision and survival yet are frequently misdiagnosed as benign lesions because of their subtle presentation and the lack of widely accessible screening tools, potentially resulting in treatment delays and the need for extensive surgical intervention. Objective: To develop and validate a smartphone-based, media-facilitated artificial intelligence (AI) system for proactive self-screening of ocular surface malignancies in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted across China from December 2022 to June 2023. A deep learning model was initially trained and validated using 12 years of multicenter slitlamp images. The system was then optimized for smartphone-based photography and deployed through a widely disseminated mobile application. Data analysis was performed from July 2023 to June 2024. Intervention: Participants used the CaptureTumor standardized smartphone application, incorporating real-time AI-guided photography instructions, to capture images of suspected lesions. The application provided immediate binary (benign vs malignant) and multiclass risk stratification and triaged high-risk cases for expedited clinical referral. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for differentiating malignant from benign lesions. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, and the number of histopathologically confirmed malignancies detected. Results: Multimedia outreach via television, social media, and internet hospitals reached 256 053 individuals, with 614 completing at-home self-screening through the app. Of these participants, the median (IQR) age was 46 (11) years (range, 4-87 years); 301 (49%) were female and 313 (51%) male. After optimizing the image quality, the smartphone-based CaptureTumor achieved an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI, 0.837-0.973), comparable with the performance of the slitlamp-based model (AUC = 0.945; 95% CI, 0.918-0.972). During real-world screening, 20 malignancies were pathologically confirmed among the 614 participants, with 19 of 20 participants (95%) newly diagnosed, and no cases requiring enucleation. At the population level, CaptureTumor demonstrated an AUC of 0.977 (95% CI, 0.964-0.990), a sensitivity of 89.3% (95% CI, 86.7%-91.9%), and a specificity of 95.9% (95% CI, 94.2%-97.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: This trial found that the integration of smartphone-enabled imaging, AI-driven diagnostics, and targeted media outreach established a scalable, accessible, and potentially clinically effective strategy for population-level screening of rare ocular malignancies. This closed-loop mobile health model potentially addresses gaps in early detection and equitable care delivery for vision- and life-threatening rare diseases. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05645341.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAdolescentAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotographyROC CurveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42240998
PMCPMC13377386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.