ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2026
Regulating the Irregular: Phage Therapy and the Case for a Regulatory Sandbox Approach in Australia.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophages (phages) are viruses that selectively kill bacteria and offer a promising option to address the growing global pandemic of antimicrobial-resistant infections. However, phage therapy does not easily align with traditional regulatory pathways designed for fixed-composition chemical drugs or biologics with fixed non-evolving compositions. Globally, alternative models such as personalised pharmacy-based formulations (known as magistral preparations), compassionate use provisions and flexible licensing have emerged to accommodate the biological complexity and personalised nature of phage-based therapeutics. Australia is well positioned to take a leadership role and consider a regulatory sandbox approach to the therapeutic use of phages that balances innovation with safety. Being time limited, this controlled framework would allow regulators and innovators to test new approaches under provisional rules and inform potential reforms. A sandbox should include strict participation criteria, and lead to the development of regulatory-ready biobanks of well-characterised phages, accelerating clinical access and manufacturing capacity. This model is a pragmatic and proactive approach that would enable safe scalable phage therapy in response to rising antimicrobial resistance threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.