ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
Social Media Use and the Quality of Family Relationships: A Six-Wave Longitudinal Study of Within-Family Effects from Age 10 to 20.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond social media time: online self-disclosure, depressive symptoms, somatic complaints, and suicidal ideation in adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents and adults spend several hours a day on social media, raising concerns that extensive social media use may negatively affect family life. However, it remains unclear whether social media use is associated with changes in family relationship quality, as prior research has not separated stable between-family differences from within-family prospective effects and has often relied on single-informant data. These limitations risk inflating associations through shared methods variance and invite misinterpretation of cross-sectional links as developmental processes. Data were drawn from two birth cohorts from Trondheim, Norway, followed across six biennial waves from ages 10 to 20 (n = 979, 52.20% girls). Adolescents' frequency of checking social media, social media activity, and social media screen time were assessed using interviews and objective measures. Parents' frequency of checking social media and problematic social media use were assessed using questionnaires. Adolescents reported on their closeness and conflicts with their parents. Attachment was measured by self-report and observation of parent-child interaction, while family functioning was assessed by both adolescent- and parent-report. Using random intercept cross-lagged panel modelling, no evidence was found for either between-family associations or within-family prospective links between adolescents' and parents' social media use and poorer quality of family relationships, family functioning, or attachment. These findings suggest that normative variation in social media use is unlikely to be a meaningful driver of changes in family relationship quality, and that concerns about everyday social media use harming family life may not be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.