Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240909›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026

Early catheter-related thrombosis in oncology patients with central venous access devices: a narrative review of incidence, mechanisms and clinical implications.

J Kania, J Zawadzki, B Kudliński, W Ziółkowska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J KaniaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland. kania.jag@gmail.com.
J ZawadzkiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.
B KudlińskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.
W ZiółkowskaUniversity Hospital of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central venous access devices (CVADs) are widely used in oncology patients to facilitate administration of chemotherapy and supportive treatments. However, catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) remains one of the most important complications associated with their use. Although overall CRT incidence has been extensively studied, early CRT occurring shortly after catheter implantation remains insufficiently characterized. A narrative review of the literature was performed focusing on studies evaluating CRT in oncology patients with central venous access devices. Relevant studies were identified through searches of the PubMed database and reference lists of selected articles. A total of thirteen studies published between 2005 and 2025 were included in this review. The studies consisted of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, non-randomized studies and retrospective cohort studies, with sample sizes ranging from 48 to 1331 participants. Most studies focused on peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), while fewer evaluated centrally inserted central catheters (CICC) or implantable ports. Reported CRT incidence varied widely depending on catheter type, ranging from 3.3% to 61.3% for PICCs, 6.5% to 49% for CICCs and 1% to 7.1% for implantable ports. Early CRT (defined as ≤ 7 days after catheter implantation) was rarely evaluated and was reported in only three studies, with incidence ranging from 2.4% to 48.39%. Across studies assessing thromboprophylaxis, overall CRT incidence ranged from 3.1% to 16.1% in control groups and from 0.4% to 14.1% in intervention groups. CRT remains a clinically relevant complication in oncology patients requiring central venous access. Available evidence suggests substantial variability in thrombosis incidence across catheter types, with generally higher rates observed in PICCs compared with implantable ports. Data on early CRT remain limited and heterogeneous, underscoring the need for prospective studies specifically addressing early thrombotic events following catheter implantation. Improved risk stratification and standardized approaches to prevention and management may enhance clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Cancer patientsCatheter-related thrombosisCentrally inserted central cathetersEarly catheter-related thrombosisImplantable port devicesPeripherally inserted central catheters

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.