Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240882›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2026

Good Responders to Rectal Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, based on the MRI Findings Can Help to Avoid Radiotherapy: A Comparative Analysis.

Daisuke Kuwata, Takuya Miura, Hiromasa Fujita, Yoshiyuki Sakamoto, Hajime Morohashi, Akiko Suto, Takuji Kagiya, Kentaro Sato, Daiki Kasai, Kenichi Hakamada

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daisuke KuwataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Takuya MiuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan. tmiura@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Hiromasa FujitaDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Yoshiyuki SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Hajime MorohashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Akiko SutoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Takuji KagiyaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Kentaro SatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Daiki KasaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.
Kenichi HakamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8216, Aomori, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the prognostic factors in preoperatively treated rectal cancer and select patients who could be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone.

methodsA total of 78 patients, 58 in the NAC group and 20 in the radiation therapy (RT) group, with rectal cancer deeper than cT3 or N+ were studied from 2016 to 2022. The survival outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy and poor prognostic factors were analyzed.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 63 months in the NAC group and 52 months in the RT group. In the multivariate analyses of all patients, a posttreatment mesorectal fascia (MRF)-positive status yielded a poor prognosis for the disease-free survival (HR, 5.051; 95% CI; 1.198-21.30, P = 0.027) and local recurrence (HR, 9.937; 95% CI; 1.282-77.05, P = 0.028). In posttreatment MRF-negative cases, the 3-year disease-free survival was 85.7% in both the NAC and RT groups (P = 0.950). The 3-year local recurrence rate was 14.3% in the RT group and 0% in the NAC group (P = 0.173).

conclusionsPosttreatment MRF positivity is an independent risk factor for a poor disease-free survival and local recurrence. However, posttreatment MRF negative cases that respond to NAC have comparable survival outcomes to those who undergo RT.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFasciaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisTreatment OutcomeAdvanced rectal cancerGood respondersMesorectal fasciaNeoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.