ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for selected borden type III dural arteriovenous fistulas.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a treatment option for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs); however, its effectiveness in Borden type III remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify clinical characteristics, indications, and outcomes of SRS for Borden type III DAVFs. Patients who underwent SRS between 1990 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, including primary SRS and adjuvant SRS after endovascular treatment (EVT) or surgery. Borden type was determined from pre-SRS angiography. Primary outcome was complete fistula obliteration, and secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, improvement of DAVF-related symptoms, and radiation-induced complications. Seventeen patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 52-75 years) and follow-up of 30 months (IQR 15-75 months). Among five hemorrhagic-onset patients, four underwent EVT and/or surgery before SRS. Primary SRS was performed in six patients (35.3%) for low-flow shunts, and adjuvant SRS in eleven (64.7%) for remnant/recurrent shunts after previous treatment. The median prescription dose was 18 Gy (IQR 18-20 Gy). Complete fistula obliteration was achieved in 13 patients (76.5%), with cumulative 2- and 5-year rates of 60.3% and 76.2%, and no difference between primary and adjuvant SRS (log-rank test, p = 0.340). DAVF-related symptoms improved in five of six patients (83.3%). No post-SRS hemorrhage or radiation-induced complications occurred. In conclusion, SRS could be a safe and effective treatment option for selected Borden type III DAVFs utilized as primary treatment for low-flow shunts or as adjuvant treatment for remnant/recurrent shunts, when other treatment modalities are not indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42240877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.