ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Antithrombotic therapy and risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with cerebral cavernous malformations: a multicenter propensity-matched cohort study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) without prior intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX Analytics Platform. Adult patients with CCMs and no prior ICH were included. Patients receiving antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) were compared with those receiving no antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome was ICH; secondary outcomes included seizures, inpatient readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits. Subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes by antithrombotic class. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
resultsAmong 8989 eligible patients, 1540 in each group were matched. ICH occurred more frequently in the antithrombotic group (6.3%) than in the no-therapy group (3.9%) (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.28-2.44; log-rank p < 0.001). Seizures (18.6% vs 10.9%; HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.52-2.23), inpatient readmission (57.3% vs 31.8%; HR 2.38, 95% CI 2.13-2.65), and ED visits (39.3% vs 28.4%; HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.50-1.92) were more common. In subgroup analyses, anticoagulant use increased ICH risk (6.8% vs 3.6%; HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.31-3.51; p = 0.002), whereas antiplatelet use did not (5.2% vs 4.3%; HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.73-2.08; p = 0.424).
conclusionsIn CCM patients without prior ICH, antithrombotic therapy was associated with increased risk of ICH and other adverse outcomes, primarily driven by anticoagulants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.