Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240826›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Dorsal bridge plating, volar plating, or both? A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes of intraarticular distal radius fracture fixation techniques.

Robin Litten, Anthony Wilson, Matthew Yeager, Robert Rutz, Ryan McIlwain, Katie Frith, Jonathan Quade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robin LittenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA. rlitten@uthsc.edu.
Anthony WilsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Matthew YeagerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Robert RutzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Ryan McIlwainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Katie FrithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Jonathan QuadeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOptimal fixation for complex AO/OTA 2R3C intraarticular distal radius fractures remains debated, particularly the role of dorsal bridge plating (DBP) alone or in combination with volar plating (VP). This study compared radiographic outcomes and complications across VP, DBP, and combined VP-DBP constructs.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single Level I trauma center (2020-2024). Adults with AO/OTA 2R3C distal radius fractures treated with VP alone, DBP alone, or combined VP-DBP and with ≥ 6 months of follow-up were included. Standard radiographic parameters (volar tilt [VT], radial height [RH], radial inclination [RI], and ulnar variance [UV]) were measured immediately postoperatively and at final follow-up. Wrist range of motion (flexion, extension, pronation, supination) at final follow-up was recorded from clinic documentation. Complications included fracture-related infection (FRI), reoperation to promote bone healing, hardware removal (HWR), and unplanned reoperation. Group comparisons used one-way ANOVA and chi-square/Fisher's exact tests.

resultsA total of 153 patients (mean age: 50 years) were included; 84 (54.9%) underwent VP, 44 (28.8%) DBP, and 25 (16.3%) combined fixation. Immediately postoperatively, DBP achieved greater RI (22.3° versus 19.7° VP versus 18.9° combined) and RH (13.4 mm versus 11.6 mm versus 11.3 mm), while VT was greatest with VP (9.9° versus 8.3° DBP versus 4.5° combined; all p < 0.05). At final follow-up, UV, VT, RI, and RH did not differ significantly between constructs, although all groups demonstrated increased UV over time, greatest in the combined cohort. FRI (0-3.6%) and unplanned reoperation (7.8% overall) rates were similar across groups. HWR was more frequent after DBP and combined fixation, reflecting planned implant removal. At final follow-up, VP demonstrated greater wrist flexion and extension compared with DBP and combined fixation (p < 0.05), while pronation and supination were similar between groups.

conclusionAcross fixation strategies for intraarticular distal radius fractures, no single construct demonstrated radiographic superiority at final follow-up, although volar plating was associated with greater flexion and extension at final follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring fixation strategy to fracture pattern and patient-specific factors when managing complex distal radius fractures.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalIntra-Articular FracturesRadius FracturesWrist FracturesAdultAgedFemaleHardware RemovalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalmar PlatePostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularDistal radius fractureDorsal bridge plateRadiographic outcomesVolar plate

Identifiers

PMID42240826
PMCPMC13236822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.