ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Deep learning and eye tracking: Convolutional neural networks provide converging evidence for experience-driven attention within visual search.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye tracking during visual search generates spatiotemporally rich but complex data. Traditional analyses often utilize simplified metrics (saccade landings, dwell time, etc.) that necessarily exclude a substantial fraction of the variance in the raw eye data. Here, we asked if deep learning might aid scientists in objectively incorporating such discarded data into analyses. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are supervised machine learning tools that excel at classifying biological data. We built several CNNs that learn from raw eye-position time-course data to classify the location of relevant stimuli (e.g., search targets/distractors). We train each CNN on two-thirds of the data and cross-validate on the rest, comparing classification accuracy to chance via traditional frequentist testing and hierarchical Bayesian modeling. Using data from two of our previous visual search studies (Massa et al., Atten Percept Psychophys 86(4):1108-1119, 2024; Grubb & Li, Atten Percept Psychophys 80:822-828, 2018), CNNs successfully classified the location of distractors with a "history as a sought target," finding evidence for reflexive, experience-driven overt attention within each oculomotor dataset. Successful prediction of distractor location generalized to a third dataset without additional training (Doyle et al., Atten Percept Psychophys 87:721-727, 2025) and outperformed a traditional saccade-landing metric. Feature visualization illustrated how the CNNs learn from eye-position samples near distractors early in trials and opposite distractors later in trials, suggestive of reflexive attentional allocations towards distractors followed by corrective shifts in gaze. We thus validate our CNN-based approach and highlight its utility in analyzing the spatiotemporally rich data gathered from eye tracking during visual search.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.