Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240798›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2026

Long-Term Weight Loss and Metabolic Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery in a Large Asian Cohort: A Real-World Cohort Study.

Wei Lun Tan, Guo Hou Loo, Guhan Muthkumaran, Nik Ritza Kosai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei Lun TanUpper GI and Metabolic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Guo Hou LooUpper GI and Metabolic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. looguohou@ukm.edu.my.
Guhan MuthkumaranUpper GI and Metabolic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nik Ritza KosaiUpper GI and Metabolic Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for obesity and its associated metabolic complications. Long-term real-world outcome data from Asian populations remain limited, particularly for procedural comparisons and longitudinal metabolic trajectories.

objectiveTo evaluate weight loss outcomes, metabolic outcomes, and clinical predictors of treatment response following bariatric surgery in a large Asian cohort, with longitudinal follow-up up to five years in a selected subgroup of completers.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,478 adult patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [LSG], Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB], or one-anastomosis gastric bypass [OAGB]) between 2012 and 2022 at a single tertiary academic center in Malaysia. The primary outcome was percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 1, 3, and 5 years, analyzed using an available-case approach. Pre-specified attrition analysis compared the characteristics of 5-year completers with non-completers. Secondary outcomes included longitudinal changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol, with paired and cross-sectional analyses reported separately. Glycaemic outcome thresholds (HbA1c < 6.5% and < 5.7%) were derived from ADA 2021 criteria; formal remission could not be ascertained because antidiabetic medication data were not available. Procedure-specific 1-year metabolic outcomes were evaluated for LSG and RYGB. Multivariable linear regression explored predictors of 1-year %TWL.

resultsMean %TWL was 20.80 ± 9.71% (n = 917) at 1 year, 25.14 ± 10.30% (n = 349) at 3 years, and 24.52 ± 10.98% (n = 107) at 5 years; the 5-year sample represented 7.2% of the original cohort and was enriched for older patients, those with diabetes and hypertension, and patients with greater 1-year %TWL (25.33% vs. 19.99% in non-completers, p < 0.001), indicating selective retention bias. Among diabetic patients with paired pre-/postoperative HbA1c (n = 35), mean 1-year reduction was 1.01% (p = 0.007); cross-sectional HbA1c among diabetic patients was 5.95 ± 1.08% at 1 year, with 80.9% achieving HbA1c < 6.5% and 47.8% < 5.7%. Significant blood pressure reductions occurred at 1 year in hypertensive patients across both LSG and RYGB subgroups. The regression model was weak (R² = 0.026); pre-existing diabetes (β = -1.83, p = 0.020) and certain non-Malay ethnicity were associated with lower 1-year %TWL as exploratory, hypothesis-generating signals warranting prospective validation. The overall complication rate was 1.7%; OAGB long-term outcomes could not be reliably assessed (5-year n = 3-4).

conclusionsBariatric surgery in this large Malaysian cohort produced significant 1-year weight loss with a favorable safety profile. Three- and five-year data, drawn from a selected subgroup of completers and subject to attrition bias, suggest preserved weight loss in those engaged with follow-up but should not be interpreted as population-level durability claims. Diabetes and ethnicity findings from a weak predictive model are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidWeight LossAdultBlood PressureFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlycated HemoglobinAsian populationBariatric surgeryLong-term outcomesMetabolic surgeryRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomyTotal weight lossType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.