Observational studyClinical rheumatology2026
Real-world efficacy and safety profile of four JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a French single-center observational study.
Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baricitinib retention and factors associated thereof in clinical practice: a prospective, multicenter 12-month study in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Rheumatology international · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate real-world treatment maintenance, effectiveness, and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess changes in prescribing patterns following the October 2022 PRAC recommendations.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included all consecutive RA patients initiating a first JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) between April 2018 and November 2023. The primary endpoint was treatment maintenance (Kaplan-Meier). Secondary outcomes included changes in DAS28-CRP and DAS28 at 6 and 12 months and reasons for treatment discontinuation. Patients initiating JAKi before versus after PRAC were compared.
resultsAmong 120 patients (85% women, mean age 57 ± 14 years, mean disease duration 19 ± 12 years, mean follow-up of 21 ± 16 months), overall treatment maintenance was 73% at 12 months, 62% at 24 months, and 57% at 36 months. Baricitinib showed the highest long-term persistence, whereas filgotinib demonstrated excellent 12-month survival in younger, low-risk patients. All JAKi significantly improved disease activity, with reductions in DAS28-CRP of -1.57 ± 1.26 at 6 months and -1.13 ± 1.63 at 12 months. Forty-nine discontinuations occurred (57% inefficacy, 35% intolerance) after a mean follow-up of 15 ± 15 months. Serious adverse events included three pulmonary embolisms and one myocardial infarction, all in high-risk patients before PRAC. No major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, or malignancies occurred after PRAC recommendations.
conclusionJAKi demonstrated effectiveness and acceptable long-term persistence. Safety outcomes were strongly influenced by baseline cardiovascular risk, underscoring the need for careful patient selection following PRAC guidance. Key Points • In routine care, all four JAK inhibitors demonstrated clinically meaningful effectiveness despite long-standing, severe and comorbid rheumatoid arthritis. • Treatment persistence differed across JAK inhibitors, but observed differences were largely driven by patient profiles and prescribing context rather than clear drug-related effects. • Implementation of PRAC recommendations in October 2022 markedly modified patient selection, with exclusion of high cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk profiles. • Serious cardiovascular and thromboembolic events occurred exclusively in high-risk patients treated before PRAC recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.