Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240789›Full record

Observational studyClinical rheumatology2026

Real-world efficacy and safety profile of four JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a French single-center observational study.

Salomé Abdellaoui, Omar Al Tabaa, Stéphane Hilliquin, Roberto d'Alessandro, Sophie Hecquet, Marion Thomas, Sandrine Carvès, Alice Combier, Yannick Allanore, Jérôme Avouac

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salomé AbdellaouiDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Omar Al TabaaDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Novo, Pontoise, France.
Stéphane HilliquinDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Roberto d'AlessandroDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sophie HecquetDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Marion ThomasDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Novo, Pontoise, France.
Sandrine CarvèsDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Alice CombierDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Yannick AllanoreDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jérôme AvouacDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France. javouac@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2463-218X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate real-world treatment maintenance, effectiveness, and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess changes in prescribing patterns following the October 2022 PRAC recommendations.

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included all consecutive RA patients initiating a first JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) between April 2018 and November 2023. The primary endpoint was treatment maintenance (Kaplan-Meier). Secondary outcomes included changes in DAS28-CRP and DAS28 at 6 and 12 months and reasons for treatment discontinuation. Patients initiating JAKi before versus after PRAC were compared.

resultsAmong 120 patients (85% women, mean age 57 ± 14 years, mean disease duration 19 ± 12 years, mean follow-up of 21 ± 16 months), overall treatment maintenance was 73% at 12 months, 62% at 24 months, and 57% at 36 months. Baricitinib showed the highest long-term persistence, whereas filgotinib demonstrated excellent 12-month survival in younger, low-risk patients. All JAKi significantly improved disease activity, with reductions in DAS28-CRP of -1.57 ± 1.26 at 6 months and -1.13 ± 1.63 at 12 months. Forty-nine discontinuations occurred (57% inefficacy, 35% intolerance) after a mean follow-up of 15 ± 15 months. Serious adverse events included three pulmonary embolisms and one myocardial infarction, all in high-risk patients before PRAC. No major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, or malignancies occurred after PRAC recommendations.

conclusionJAKi demonstrated effectiveness and acceptable long-term persistence. Safety outcomes were strongly influenced by baseline cardiovascular risk, underscoring the need for careful patient selection following PRAC guidance. Key Points • In routine care, all four JAK inhibitors demonstrated clinically meaningful effectiveness despite long-standing, severe and comorbid rheumatoid arthritis. • Treatment persistence differed across JAK inhibitors, but observed differences were largely driven by patient profiles and prescribing context rather than clear drug-related effects. • Implementation of PRAC recommendations in October 2022 markedly modified patient selection, with exclusion of high cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk profiles. • Serious cardiovascular and thromboembolic events occurred exclusively in high-risk patients treated before PRAC recommendations.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidJanus Kinase InhibitorsAdultAgedAzetidinesFemaleFranceHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPurinesPyrazolesPyridinesAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesbaricitinibGLPG0634Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus Kinase InhibitorsPiperidinesPurinesPyrazolesPyridinesPyrimidinesPyrrolesSulfonamidestofacitinibTriazolesupadacitinibJanus kinaseRheumatoid arthritisTherapeutic maintenance

Identifiers

PMID42240789
PMCPMC13342397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.