Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240774›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Leveraging the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of Cymbopogon flexuosus essential oil against multidrug-resistant bacteria recovered from avian colibacillosis and bovine mastitis: in vitro and molecular docking insights.

Sana Dhaouadi, Oussema Khamessi, Roua Ben Dassi, Abdennacer Boulila, Ramzi Boubaker Elandoulsi, Rim Driouich Chaouachi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sana DhaouadiISBST, BVBGR-LR11ES31, Biotechpole Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Ariana, 2020, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-2591
Oussema KhamessiHigher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet, Manouba University, Ariana, Manouba, BP-66, 2010, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-5705
Roua Ben DassiISBST, BVBGR-LR11ES31, Biotechpole Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Ariana, 2020, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8436-2353
Abdennacer BoulilaLaboratory of Natural Substances LR10INRAP02, National Institute of Research and Physico Chemical Analyses, Biotechpole of Sidi Thabet, Ariana, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3521-7002
Ramzi Boubaker ElandoulsiISBST, BVBGR-LR11ES31, Biotechpole Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Ariana, 2020, Tunisia. ramzi.b.landolsi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-9569
Rim Driouich ChaouachiISBST, BVBGR-LR11ES31, Biotechpole Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Ariana, 2020, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9028-0717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the chemical composition and antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of Cymbopogon flexuosus essential oil (CFEO) against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria within a One Health framework. The bacterial panel comprised four clinical isolates (n = 1 per source): a methicillin-resistant Mammaliicoccus sciuri (MR-M. sciuri) from bovine mastitis, a colistin-resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) from avian colibacillosis, and MR-Staphylococcus haemolyticus (MR-S. haemolyticus) and MDR Staphylococcus aureus (MDR S. aureus) from healthy farm personnel in contact with diseased animals. GC-MS analysis was performed to study the chemical composition of the CFEO. Antibacterial activities were evaluated via disk diffusion and broth microdilution assays. Disk diffusion was used exclusively as a qualitative screening tool to identify potential interactions; synergy was assessed definitively through the checkerboard assay by calculating the Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI). The antibiofilm activity of CFEO was quantified via Congo red agar, crystal violet staining, and light microscopy. Molecular docking simulation was performed to assess the binding interactions of the CFEO constituents with key bacterial proteins. The major constituents of CFEO were geranial (α-citral; 32.98%), neral (β-citral; 28.62%), β-terpinene (11.50%), geraniol (5.42%), nerol acetate (3.40%), and linalool (2.31%). The inhibition zones ranged from 38 ± 2.00 to 56 ± 1.00 mm, while the MIC values spanned from 8 to 8192 µg/mL. CFEO demonstrated a synergistic effect with oxacillin against MR-M. sciuri (FICI = 0.28). Sub-MIC concentrations of CFEO significantly disrupted the biofilms of M. sciuri and E. coli. Bioinformatics analysis via molecular docking revealed favorable binding affinities between major compounds of CFEO and key bacterial proteins, including PBP2a, SarA, and AgrA. This study highlights the in vitro efficacy of CFEO against MDR, MR and biofilm-forming bacteria circulating at the animal-human interface, as well as its synergistic potential when combined with oxacillin against MR-M. sciuri. Molecular docking analyses suggest that the major compounds of CFEO may act as promising adjuvants in the development of new therapeutic strategies against MDR bacteria within a One Health framework.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCymbopogonDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialMastitis, BovineOils, VolatileAnimalsCattleEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationAnti-Bacterial AgentsOils, VolatileAntibacterial and antibiofilm activitiesAvian colibacillosisBovine mastitisCymbopogon flexuosus essential oilMDR bacteriaMolecular docking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.